Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Header Banner – Finance
Bridging the Infrastructure Funding Gap in the UK

Bridging the Infrastructure Funding Gap in the UK

Bridging the Infrastructure Funding Gap in the UK

The UK’s infrastructure landscape faces a looming challenge—one that could derail critical national projects if not addressed. According to a comprehensive report by Ernst & Young (EY), titled Mind the (Investment) Gap, the nation is staring at a funding shortfall of at least £700 billion for infrastructure and capital projects through to 2040.

The report estimates a staggering £1.6 trillion worth of capital programmes are currently unfunded, raising significant concerns about the future of essential projects. With inflation soaring and geopolitical tensions adding strain, the financial gap in infrastructure is fast becoming an issue of national concern.

UK Infrastructure Spending in Crisis Mode

As inflation continues to bite, driving up the costs of construction and development, the EY report brings to light the startling fact that the UK’s infrastructure funding gap could soon spiral out of control. Even if the government maintains its historical capital spending patterns, only around half of the identified shortfall could be addressed. This leaves a significant gap—£700 billion—that will likely need to be filled by alternative funding sources, particularly the private sector.

To put it bluntly, the UK needs to double its current private sector investment to ensure its infrastructure projects don’t fall by the wayside. But as we dive deeper into the report, it becomes clear that this is easier said than done.

Inflation and Cost Overruns Add Fuel to the Fire

Inflation has been a major driver in pushing up project costs, with Producer Price Index (PPI) inflation peaking at a staggering 24.4% in 2022. By that measure, a project started in 2016 would now be nearly 50% more expensive. That’s not small change—it’s a dramatic shift in the financial viability of long-term projects. Furthermore, EY’s analysis shows that if cost overruns seen in the past decade repeat over the next 15 years, the gap could balloon by an additional £1 trillion. And that’s before factoring in the potential impacts of geopolitical tensions, which could drive costs even higher by forcing increased defence spending and inflating the price of materials.

Mats Persson, Partner at EY Parthenon, notes: “Almost every Western country is facing a growing gap between the capital investment needed to meet green, economic, and strategic priorities, and the amount governments can afford to spend.”

It’s a stark reality for a country with lofty goals—like net-zero carbon emissions, a modern transport system, and resilient national infrastructure. The sheer scale of the problem means that unless drastic measures are taken, many of the UK’s most important infrastructure projects could be delayed or scrapped altogether.

The Domino Effect of Rising Debt Payments

Adding to the financial strain is the UK’s mounting debt. Debt interest payments have skyrocketed threefold, from £38 billion in 2019-2020 to £104.7 billion in 2023-2024. This increase in debt servicing limits the government’s ability to allocate sufficient funds to critical projects. Fiscal rules further complicate the picture, capping borrowing and debt and leaving less wiggle room for new capital investments.

With the country locked into these tight fiscal parameters, the government’s traditional role as the primary funder of infrastructure projects is under threat. According to EY’s estimates, even in a best-case scenario where the government keeps up its historical capital expenditure patterns, only half of the £1.6 trillion worth of projects would be funded by 2040. Clearly, new approaches are needed.

Project Finance for International Infrastructure and Construction

Private Investment

So where does the UK go from here? One potential solution lies in attracting more private investment. As EY points out, if private sector involvement doesn’t increase dramatically, the country risks stalling on key infrastructure initiatives, from roads and railways to decarbonising public buildings and hospitals.

EY’s analysis offers some insight into the kind of money that could be unlocked. If the UK were to match the private investment levels of some OECD countries, particularly those that have successfully implemented alternative financing models, an additional £326 billion could be raised for transport infrastructure alone over the next 15 years.

That’s a huge number, but how does the UK tap into that potential? Well, it may be time for the government and the private sector to look abroad for inspiration. In Japan, for example, value capture models have been used to great effect. Similarly, Austria’s charging models offer a way to incentivise private investment without relying solely on government subsidies.

The Missing Piece of the Puzzle

Another promising solution is the adoption of new technologies—particularly AI. The infrastructure sector has been notoriously slow to adopt tech innovations, despite clear evidence that they can drive down costs and improve project timelines. EY’s report highlights the potential for AI to be a game-changer. If AI is deployed effectively, it could cut costs by as much as 15%, resulting in £158 billion in savings by 2040. That’s not an insignificant number, especially in a sector where cost overruns are the norm rather than the exception.

Sayeh Ghanbari, Business Consulting Leader at EY, believes AI holds the key to reversing this trend. “The acceleration of AI presents an opportunity for the sector to reverse this trend,” she says. “Infrastructure projects have traditionally been slow to incorporate new technologies, even in areas where it’s widely accepted as best practice.”

But technology alone won’t be enough. The UK needs to combine the benefits of AI with smarter project planning and more efficient design phases. According to EY, improving the efficiency of the design phase alone could reduce overall project costs by 20-25%.

National Priorities, Local Impact

Let’s not forget the broader context here. The UK’s infrastructure needs are about more than just economics—they’re about national priorities. From healthcare to defence, the projects in the pipeline are vital to the country’s future well-being. The National Infrastructure Commission and the Department of Health and Social Care have both identified a range of projects critical to the country’s long-term growth and resilience.

This includes everything from decarbonising public buildings to modernising transport networks and ensuring the country’s defence capabilities are up to scratch. With the government committed to spending 2.5% of GDP on defence, that’s a significant chunk of change that could otherwise be spent on civilian projects.

A New Way Forward for UK Infrastructure

The challenges ahead are immense, but they’re not insurmountable. With the right mix of private investment, technology adoption, and alternative financing models, the UK could close its infrastructure funding gap and deliver on its ambitious projects. The EY report underscores the need for policymakers, developers, and investors to come together to find innovative solutions.

It’s time for a fresh approach—one that embraces change and recognises the value of collaboration. The future of UK infrastructure depends on it.

Bridging the Infrastructure Funding Gap in the UK

About The Author

Anthony brings a wealth of global experience to his role as Managing Editor of Highways.Today. With an extensive career spanning several decades in the construction industry, Anthony has worked on diverse projects across continents, gaining valuable insights and expertise in highway construction, infrastructure development, and innovative engineering solutions. His international experience equips him with a unique perspective on the challenges and opportunities within the highways industry.

Related posts